<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Design Evolves &#187; W3C</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tinycg.com/tag/w3c/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tinycg.com</link>
	<description>create, evolve, experiment</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 22:16:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Browser Rage Coalition</title>
		<link>http://www.tinycg.com/2007/11/09/the-browser-rage-coalition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tinycg.com/2007/11/09/the-browser-rage-coalition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 23:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tiny</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browser Rage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dum Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Browser Rage Coalition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[W3C]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tinycg.com/2007/11/09/the-browser-rage-coalition/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dan, I&#8217;m with you on this one. I&#8217;ve gotten so fed up with mainly Internet Explorer&#8217;s full disregard for the rules. I&#8217;m not about to go out and say that everyone has to abide by W3C because they say so.. &#8230; <a href="http://www.tinycg.com/2007/11/09/the-browser-rage-coalition/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.danconley.net/index.php/2007/10/22/browser-rage" target="_blank">Dan, I&#8217;m with you on this one.</a> I&#8217;ve gotten so fed up with mainly Internet Explorer&#8217;s full disregard for the rules. I&#8217;m not about to go out and say that everyone has to abide by W3C because they say so.. however, everyone else abides by the W3C so by the nature of the beast any display device has to as well.</p>
<p>It would be like Panasonic saying, yeah we&#8217;ll play DVDs, but when we see the color green we don&#8217;t render it, because well.. we had problems figuring out the bug so we gave up.</p>
<p><span id="more-14"></span></p>
<p>The fact is Opera is the most compliment at about 96% with FF following at 94%.. and IE 6 was so far behind with such huge future gaps I would say the number is inaccurate no matter what you came up with. IE 7 is better.. but as Dan points out.. they didn&#8217;t fix obvious gaps.</p>
<p>Now Opera fans out there should be all &#8216;Wee, see we are the bestest!&#8217;.. but thats not necessarily accurate either, when you take into account Opera and Firefox&#8217;s market share you&#8217;ll find that most designers don&#8217;t test for Opera. Instead opting to test for FF and IE to save time and money. The thinking is.. well Opera is the most accurate so I should be fine. What they fail to realize is that accuracy can lead to display bugs as the inconsistent markup in FF and IE is exposed for one reason or another.</p>
<p>Sure you could run conditionals to check for the browser and load different CSS, but thats assuming its a CSS design. While thats the way to go for new sites, retrofitting an old site can be damn tricky.</p>
<p>I miss broadcast design.. does it show up on the NTSC monitor correctly.. check.. 99% done and normally good enough as long as you cut the white and black by 10% to be safe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tinycg.com/2007/11/09/the-browser-rage-coalition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
